Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchmidt, Christian
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-23T09:27:53Z
dc.date.available2012-07-23T09:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/9802
dc.language.isofren
dc.subjectMoraleen
dc.subjectUtilitarismeen
dc.subjectSen, Amartya (1933-....)en
dc.subject.ddc330.1en
dc.subject.classificationjelA13en
dc.subject.classificationjelD71en
dc.subject.classificationjelB31en
dc.titleSen n'est-il pas utilitariste ?en
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenUtilitarianism represents a major reference to which Sen's writings refer back when it comes to the ethics of collective choices. Which utilitarianism is it; Sentham and Sidgwick's historical utilitarianism, the utilitarianism impregnated with marginal calculation a la Edgeworth, or the contemporary utilitarianism of Harsanyi and Hammond? This article's approach is, that what Sen calls "utilitarianism" is the result of a personal construction which serves various purposes. It gives him first of all a unified frame of reference which polarises all the criticisms which he formulates concerning the economic theory of rational individual and collective choices. However, it also suggests some technical possibilities for introducing the ethical dimension into economic analysis.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameRevue d'économie politique
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol110en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue5en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2000
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages617-630en
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.subject.ddclabelThéorie économiqueen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record