Lessons from The French Exception: How Firms Choose Between Unitary and Dual Boards
Indexation documentaireOrganisation et finances d'entreprise
Subjectmonitoring; supervisory board; corporate governance; dual board; management board; unitary board; Board of directors
Code JELG.G3.G34; G.G3.G32
Titre du colloque2012 FMA European Conference
Date du colloque06-2012
Ville du colloqueIstanbul
Pays du colloqueTURKEY
MétadonnéesAfficher la notice complète
1098 Théorie économique, modélisation et applications [THEMA]
1032 Dauphine Recherches en Management [DRM]
Résumé en anglaisMany governance reform proposals focus on strengthening board monitoring. In contrast, Adams and Ferreira (2007) and Harris and Raviv (2008) conclude that a passive board is often optimal. We examine determinants of board structure choice in France, where firms are free to choose between a unitary (passive) board and a dual (monitoring) board. We find firms with greater asymmetric information are likely to adopt a unitary board. Firms with a high potential for private benefit extraction are likely to adopt dual boards. Firms well monitored by financial market and institutional forces are less likely to have dual boards. Our results imply that freedom of contract about board structure is valuable for shareholders.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Reforming Corporate Governance: Evidence from the Choice between Unitary versus Dual Boards of Directors Belot, François; Ginglinger, Edith; Slovin, Myron; Sushka, Marie (2012) Communication / Conférence
Belot, François; Ginglinger, Edith; Slovin, Myron; Sushka, Marie (2014) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
To make risk invisible: the institutionalization of the relationship between the board of directors and the auditors Richard, Chrystelle (2003) Communication / Conférence