Lexicographic α-robustness : an alternative to min-maxcriteria
Kalaï, Rim; Lamboray, Claude; Vanderpooten, Daniel (2012), Lexicographic α-robustness : an alternative to min-maxcriteria, European Journal of Operational Research, 220, 3, p. 722-728. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.01.056
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publiéDate
2012Journal name
European Journal of Operational ResearchVolume
220Number
3Publisher
Elsevier
Pages
722-728
Publication identifier
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract (EN)
Robustness in Operations Research/Decision Aid is often associated with min-max and min-max regret criteria. This common approach to determine robust solutions consists in finding a solution which minimizes the maximal cost or regret. Nevertheless, these criteria are known to be too conservative. In this paper, we present and study a new robustness approach, called lexicographic α-robustness, which compensates for this major drawback and many others. Furthermore, we establish a link between lexicographic α-robustness and a third robustness approach called p-robustness.Subjects / Keywords
Robustness; Uncertainty modelling; Min-max cost/regret; Scenarios; Preference relationsRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Kalaï, Rim; Aloulou, Mohamed Ali; Vallin, Philippe; Vanderpooten, Daniel (2010) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Vanderpooten, Daniel; Kalaï, Rim (2006) Communication / Conférence
-
Kalaï, Rim; Vanderpooten, Daniel (2011) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Kalaï, Rim; Aloulou, Mohamed Ali; Vallin, Philippe; Vanderpooten, Daniel (2006) Document de travail / Working paper
-
Aloulou, Mohamed Ali; Kalaï, Rim; Vallin, Philippe; Vanderpooten, Daniel (2005) Communication / Conférence