• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Aide
  • Connexion
  • Langue 
    • Français
    • English
Consulter le document 
  •   Accueil
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • Consulter le document
  •   Accueil
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • Consulter le document
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Afficher

Toute la baseCentres de recherche & CollectionsAnnée de publicationAuteurTitreTypeCette collectionAnnée de publicationAuteurTitreType

Mon compte

Connexion

Enregistrement

Statistiques

Documents les plus consultésStatistiques par paysAuteurs les plus consultés
Thumbnail

Familiarity Breeds Institutional Investment: Evidence from US Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Atanasova, Christina; Chemla, Gilles (2010), Familiarity Breeds Institutional Investment: Evidence from US Defined Benefit Pension Plans. https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/5523

Voir/Ouvrir
cahier_chaire_31.PDF (600.1Kb)
Type
Document de travail / Working paper
Date
2010
Éditeur
Université Paris-Dauphine
Titre de la collection
Cahiers de la Chaire Finance et Développement Durable
Numéro dans la collection
31
Ville d’édition
Paris
Pages
31
Métadonnées
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur(s)
Atanasova, Christina

Chemla, Gilles
Résumé (EN)
This paper provides new evidence that familiarity bias affects the portfolios of institutional investors. Using a sample of large US defined-benefit pension plans for the period 1992 to 2002, we show that the corporate focus of the sponsoring firm has an impact on the investment policy of the pension plan. Pension plans sponsored by firms with a high proportion of foreign sales are more likely to invest in international assets, plans sponsored by firms that are active in research and development are more likely to invest in private equity, and plans with sponsors that have more fixed assets are more likely to invest in real estate and mortgages. Comparing to existing explanations of why plans tilt their portfolios towards the sponsor’s focus, familiarity bias is the most compelling one. The worse performance of pension plans with such portfolio allocation bias is consistent with pension managers being over-confident about familiar assets.
Mots-clés
Institutional investment; defined benefit pension plans; familiarity bias
JEL
G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

Publications associées

Affichage des éléments liés par titre et auteur.

  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Familiarity Breeds Alternative Investment: Evidence from Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans 
    Atanasova, Christina; Chemla, Gilles (2014-08) Document de travail / Working paper
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Familiarity Breeds Alternative Investment: Evidence from Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans 
    Chemla, Gilles; Atanasova, Christina (2019) Communication / Conférence
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Familiarity Breeds Alternative Investment: Evidence from Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans 
    Chemla, Gilles (2018) Communication / Conférence
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    How can defined contribution pension plans benefit from momentum and mean reversion ? 
    Chetouane, Mabrouk (2011) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Vignette de prévisualisation
    Pension Fund Investment in Private Equity and Venture Capital in the U.S. and Canada 
    Chemla, Gilles (2004) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Tél. : 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo