• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • DRM (UMR CNRS 7088)
  • DRM : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail

Familiarity Breeds Institutional Investment: Evidence from US Defined Benefit Pension Plans

Atanasova, Christina; Chemla, Gilles (2010), Familiarity Breeds Institutional Investment: Evidence from US Defined Benefit Pension Plans. https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/5523

View/Open
cahier_chaire_31.PDF (600.1Kb)
Type
Document de travail / Working paper
Date
2010
Publisher
Université Paris-Dauphine
Series title
Cahiers de la Chaire Finance et Développement Durable
Series number
31
Published in
Paris
Pages
31
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Atanasova, Christina

Chemla, Gilles
Abstract (EN)
This paper provides new evidence that familiarity bias affects the portfolios of institutional investors. Using a sample of large US defined-benefit pension plans for the period 1992 to 2002, we show that the corporate focus of the sponsoring firm has an impact on the investment policy of the pension plan. Pension plans sponsored by firms with a high proportion of foreign sales are more likely to invest in international assets, plans sponsored by firms that are active in research and development are more likely to invest in private equity, and plans with sponsors that have more fixed assets are more likely to invest in real estate and mortgages. Comparing to existing explanations of why plans tilt their portfolios towards the sponsor’s focus, familiarity bias is the most compelling one. The worse performance of pension plans with such portfolio allocation bias is consistent with pension managers being over-confident about familiar assets.
Subjects / Keywords
Institutional investment; defined benefit pension plans; familiarity bias
JEL
G12 - Asset Pricing; Trading Volume; Bond Interest Rates
G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors
G11 - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    Familiarity Breeds Alternative Investment: Evidence from Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans 
    Atanasova, Christina; Chemla, Gilles (2014-08) Document de travail / Working paper
  • Thumbnail
    Familiarity Breeds Alternative Investment: Evidence from Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans 
    Chemla, Gilles; Atanasova, Christina (2019) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Familiarity Breeds Alternative Investment: Evidence from Corporate Defined-Benefit Pension Plans 
    Chemla, Gilles (2018) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    How can defined contribution pension plans benefit from momentum and mean reversion ? 
    Chetouane, Mabrouk (2011) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Pension Fund Investment in Private Equity and Venture Capital in the U.S. and Canada 
    Chemla, Gilles (2004) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo