A note on the paper, “Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods”, by Wang and Triantaphyllou, Omega (2008)

dc.contributor.author	Figueira, José
dc.contributor.author	Roy, Bernard
dc.date.accessioned	2010-12-14T13:59:00Z
dc.date.available	2010-12-14T13:59:00Z
dc.date.issued	2009
dc.identifier.uri	https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/5301
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.subject	Multicriteria	en
dc.subject.ddc	003	en
dc.title	A note on the paper, “Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods”, by Wang and Triantaphyllou, Omega (2008)	en
dc.type	Article accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstracten	The paper by Wang and Triantaphyllou [Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods. Omega, 2008; 36(1): 45–63] (W & T) pinpoints in an interesting way some limitations of ELECTRE II and III methods. The objective of this note is to draw the attention of the reader to a different philosophy of interpreting the results of ELECTRE methods from the one provided by the authors, particularly the different interpretations of the results reported.	en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlname	Omega
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol	37	en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue	3	en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate	2009
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages	731-733	en
dc.relation.isversionofdoi	http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2008.05.001	en
dc.description.sponsorshipprivate	oui	en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisher	Elsevier	en
dc.subject.ddclabel	Recherche opérationnelle	en

Files in this item

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.