• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail

Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Decision Aiding Process

Ouerdane, Wassila; Maudet, Nicolas; Tsoukiàs, Alexis (2008), Argument Schemes and Critical Questions for Decision Aiding Process, in Besnard, Philippe; Doutre, Sylvie; Hunter, Anthony, Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2008, IOS Press : Amsterdam, p. 285-296

View/Open
comma08.pdf (98.89Kb)
comma08_presentation.pdf (662.3Kb)
Type
Communication / Conférence
Date
2008
Conference title
2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2008)
Conference date
2008-05
Conference city
Toulouse
Conference country
France
Book title
Computational Models of Argument - Proceedings of COMMA 2008
Book author
Besnard, Philippe; Doutre, Sylvie; Hunter, Anthony
Publisher
IOS Press
Series title
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Series number
172
Published in
Amsterdam
ISBN
978-1-58603-859-5
Number of pages
440
Pages
285-296
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Ouerdane, Wassila cc
Maudet, Nicolas cc
Tsoukiàs, Alexis cc
Abstract (EN)
Our ambition in this paper is to begin to specify in argumentative terms (some of) the steps involved in a decision-aiding process. To do that, we make use of the popular notion of argument schemes, and specify the related critical questions. A hierarchical structure of argument schemes allows to decompose the process into several distinct steps—and for each of them the underlying premises are made explicit, which allows in turn to identify how these steps can be dialectically defeated via critical questions. This work initiates a systematic study which aims at constituting a significant step forward for forthcoming decision-aiding tools. The kind of system that we foresee and sketch here would allow: (i) to present a rec- ommendation that can be explicitly justified; (ii) to revise any piece of reasoning involved in this process, and be informed of the consequences of such moves; and possibly (iii) to stimulate the client by generating contradictory arguments.
Subjects / Keywords
Decision aiding; argument schemes; critical questions

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding 
    Ouerdane, Wassila; Tsoukiàs, Alexis; Maudet, Nicolas (2010) Chapitre d'ouvrage
  • Thumbnail
    Dealing with the dynamics of proof-standard in argumentation-based decision aiding 
    Ouerdane, Wassila; Maudet, Nicolas; Tsoukiàs, Alexis (2010) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Discussing Proof-Standards in the Context of Multiple Criteria Decision-Aiding 
    Tsoukiàs, Alexis; Maudet, Nicolas; Ouerdane, Wassila (2009) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Minimal and Complete Explanations for Critical Multi-attribute Decisions 
    Labreuche, Christophe; Maudet, Nicolas; Ouerdane, Wassila (2011) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Arguing over Actions that Involve Multiple Criteria: A Critical Review 
    Ouerdane, Wassila; Maudet, Nicolas; Tsoukiàs, Alexis (2007) Communication / Conférence
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo