Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoy, Bernard
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-29T09:48:28Z
dc.date.available2010-06-29T09:48:28Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/4486
dc.descriptionLe fichier attaché est le texte du discours de réception du doctorat Honoris Causa décerné le 30 janvier 2009 à l'auteur par l' Università degli Studi di Catania (Italie). Il résume les idées exposées dans l'article.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectMCDMen
dc.subjectmulticriteria decision makingen
dc.subjectdecision supporten
dc.subjectweightsen
dc.subjectincomparabilityen
dc.subjectco-constructionen
dc.subjectoptimumen
dc.subjectobjectivityen
dc.subjectlegitimisationen
dc.subjectpreference modellingen
dc.subjectdecision aidingen
dc.subject.ddc003en
dc.titleTwo conceptions of decision aidingen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenAfter a brief presentation of three pillars on which decision aiding is founded, the paper describes two clearly different conceptions on which decision aiding can be carried out. The first one (Section 2) is primarily positivist, and the second one (Section 3) is primarily constructivist. These two conceptions are not incompatible and do not exhaustively cover all the conceptions conceived and used. Section 4 illustrates the differences between these two conceptions with regard to a specific point. Section 5 schematises on three levels what differentiates these two conceptions.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameInternational Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol1en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue1en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2010
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages74-79en
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJMCDM.2010.033687en
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherInderscienceen
dc.subject.ddclabelRecherche opérationnelleen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record