• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail

Limitations of cost benefit analysis to support public debate: the case of public transportation decision-making in France

Damart, Sébastien; Roy, Bernard (2007), Limitations of cost benefit analysis to support public debate: the case of public transportation decision-making in France. https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/4406

View/Open
cahierLamsade252.pdf (487.6Kb)
Type
Document de travail / Working paper
Date
2007
Publisher
Cahier du LAMSADE
Series title
Cahier du LAMSADE
Published in
Paris
Pages
38
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Damart, Sébastien
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Roy, Bernard
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Abstract (FR)
L'analyse coûts avantages est un outil d'évaluation des impacts potentiels des choix d'investissements publics. Dans de nombreux pays, en particulier la France, il est notamment mobilisé dans le cadre de processus de décision publique portant sur les investissements en infrastructures de transport. Dans les contextes de ressources publiques contraintes, la prise en compte des effets multiples de projets d'infrastructures de transport se pose sous forme d'un problème double. D'un côté, le décideur public doit gérer de la meilleure façon possible ses ressources, limitées. De l'autre côté, quand le décideur public choisit parmi différentes alternatives, il est amené à révéler un ordre de priorité qu'il a implicitement posé entre la satisfaction de différents intérêts, et cet ordre doit être perçu comme légitime. Le cas français illustre la difficulté de trouver un équilibre satisfaisant entre les connaissances experts produites par les méthodes d'ACA et les connaissances que dégage la participation des acteurs parties prenantes au cours du processus de décision. S'appuyant sur l'étude de la façon dont les institutions françaises font usage de l'ACA, cet article a pour but d'explorer comment l'utilisation des méthodes d'ACA interagit avec la pratique du débat public en France Aujourd'hui. Abstract: Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is a tool used to evaluate the potential socio-economic impact of public investment choices. In many countries, particularly in France, this tool is used to support decision-making related to transportation infrastructure. In the context of questionable budgetary arbitrations, taking the multiple effects of the different choices into account makes choosing among transport infrastructure investments is a two-fold problem. On the one hand, public decision-makers have limited resources that they must use in the best way possible. On the other hand, when choosing among alternative investment projects, the decision-makers reveal the priority they have assigned to the different stakes, and these priorities must be perceived as legitimate. The French case illustrates the difficulty of striking the right balance between the expert knowledge produced by CBA methods and what is induced by the participation of various stakeholders to the decision making process. Based on a study of how French institutions make use of the CBA method, this paper aims at examining how the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) interacts with the practice of public debate and stakeholder participation in France today.
Abstract (EN)
Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) is a tool used to evaluate the potential socio-economic impact of public investment choices. In many countries, particularly in France, this tool is used to support decision-making related to transportation infrastructure.In the context of questionable budgetary arbitrations, taking the multiple effects of the different choices into account makes choosing among transport infrastructure investments is a two-fold problem. On the one hand, public decision-makers have limited resources that they must use in the best way possible. On the other hand, when choosing among alternative investment projects, the decision-makers reveal the priority they have assigned to the different stakes, and these priorities must be perceived as legitimate. The French case illustrates the difficulty of striking the right balance between the expert knowledge produced by CBA methods and what is induced by the participation of various stakeholders to the decision making process. Based on a study of how French institutions make use of the CBA method, this paper aims at examining how the use of cost-benefit analysis (CBA) interacts with the practice of public debate and stakeholder participation in France today.
Subjects / Keywords
Cost benefit analysis; stakeholders participation; transportation decision-making process; concertation; processus de décision publique de transport; Analyse coûts avantages; parties prenantes

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    The uses of cost–benefit analysis in public transportation decision-making in France 
    Damart, Sébastien; Roy, Bernard (2009) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Integrated micro-economic modelling and multi-criteria methodology to support public decision-making: the case of liquid bio-fuels in France 
    Rozakis, Stelios; Sourie, Jean-Claude; Vanderpooten, Daniel (2001) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Implementing a Public Transport Line: Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods that Facilitate Concertation 
    Diab, Youssef; Roy, Bernard; Labbouz, Sophie; Christen, Michel (2008) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    Development of a decision aiding tool for the evolution of public transport ticket pricing in the Paris region 
    Mousseau, Vincent; Roy, Bernard; Sommerlatt, Isabelle (2001) Chapitre d'ouvrage
  • Thumbnail
    Le processus de décision dans les systèmes complexes : une analyse d’une intervention systémique 
    Bérard, Céline (2009-11) Thèse
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo