dc.contributor.author | Jonard, Nicolas | |
dc.contributor.author | Jeunet, Jully | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-12-18T10:54:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-12-18T10:54:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/2775 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Single-level lot sizing | en |
dc.subject | MRP systems | en |
dc.subject | Cost-effectiveness | en |
dc.subject | Nervousness | en |
dc.subject | Robustness | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 658.5 | en |
dc.subject.classificationjel | L23 | en |
dc.subject.classificationjel | M11 | en |
dc.title | Measuring the performance of lot-sizing techniques in uncertain environments | en |
dc.type | Article accepté pour publication ou publié | |
dc.description.abstracten | Cost-effectiveness and computational time are the traditional criteria for evaluating lot-sizing techniques. However, in evolving environments, frequent revisions of demand forecasts may induce various degrees of instability in planned orders, depending on the selected lot-sizing technique. In poorly flexible production systems, the cost of implementing these alterations may overcome the benefits from using a cost-efficient technique. In this paper, we evaluate lot-sizing techniques on the basis of two criteria. The first is the traditional cost-effectiveness criterion. The second, that we call robustness, is designed to capture some of the characteristic features of decision-making in uncertain environments. Robustness is related to the stability of the set-up streams when demand fluctuates. We propose and discuss several alternative measures of robustness. The simulation results clearly show an inverse relationship between cost-effectiveness and instability. Therefore, managers should take into account these two “opposite” dimensions in their decision process, under quite unforeseeable environments. | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlname | International Journal of Production Economics | |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol | 64 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue | 1-3 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate | 2000-03 | |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages | 197-208 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(99)00058-4 | en |
dc.description.sponsorshipprivate | oui | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisher | Elsevier Science | en |
dc.subject.ddclabel | Gestion de production | en |