dc.contributor.author | Portmann, Marie-Claude | |
dc.contributor.author | Kovalyov, Mikhail Y. | |
dc.contributor.author | Aloulou, Mohamed Ali | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-12-10T09:44:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-12-10T09:44:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/2650 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Scheduling | en |
dc.subject | single machine | en |
dc.subject | maxi- mization problems | en |
dc.subject.ddc | 003 | en |
dc.title | Evaluating flexible solutions in single machine scheduling via objective function maximization: the study of a computational complexity | en |
dc.type | Article accepté pour publication ou publié | |
dc.contributor.editoruniversityother | Belarusian State University Minsk;Biélorussie | |
dc.contributor.editoruniversityother | INRIA-Lorraine,Nancy;France | |
dc.description.abstracten | We study a deterministic problem of evaluating the worst
case performance of flexible solutions in the single machine scheduling.
A flexible solution is a set of schedules following a given structure de-
termined by a partial order of jobs and a type of the schedules. In
this paper, the schedules of active and non-delay type are considered.
A flexible solution can be used on-line to absorb the impact of data
disturbances related to, for example, job arrival, tool availability or
machine breakdowns. The performance of a flexible solution includes
the best case and the worst case performances. The best case perfor-
mance is an ideal performance that can be achieved only if the on-line
conditions allow to implement the best schedule of the set of schedules
characterizing the flexible solution. In contrast, the worst case perfor-
mance indicates how poorly the flexible solution may perform when fol-
lowing the given structure in the on-line circumstances. The best-case
and the worst-case performances are usually evaluated by the minimum
and maximum values of the considered objective function, respectively.
We present algorithmic and computational complexity results for some
maximization scheduling problems. In these problems, the jobs to be
scheduled have different release dates and precedence constraints may
be given on the set of jobs. | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlname | RAIRO | |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol | 41 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue | 1 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate | 2007 | |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages | 1-18 | en |
dc.relation.isversionofdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/ro:20070012 | en |
dc.description.sponsorshipprivate | oui | en |
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisher | EDP Sciences | en |
dc.subject.ddclabel | Recherche opérationnelle | en |