• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail - No thumbnail

On Answering Why-Not Queries Against Scientific Workflow Provenance

Belhajjame, Khalid (2018), On Answering Why-Not Queries Against Scientific Workflow Provenance, Advances in Database Technology — EDBT 2018, OpenProceedings.org : Konstanz, p. 465-468. 10.5441/002/edbt.2018.48

View/Open
paper-285.pdf (1.278Mb)
Type
Communication / Conférence
External document link
https://openproceedings.org/2018/conf/edbt/paper-285.pdf
Date
2018
Conference title
21st International Conference on Extending Database Technology
Conference date
2018-05
Conference city
Vienna
Conference country
Austria
Book title
Advances in Database Technology — EDBT 2018
Publisher
OpenProceedings.org
Published in
Konstanz
ISBN
978-3-89318-078-3
Number of pages
705
Pages
465-468
Publication identifier
10.5441/002/edbt.2018.48
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Belhajjame, Khalid
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Abstract (EN)
Why-not queries help scientists understand why a given data item was not returned by the executions of a given workflow. While answering such queries has been investigated for relational databases, there is only one proposal in this area for workflow provenance, viz. the Why-Not algorithm. This algorithm makes the assumption that the modules implementing the steps of the work!ow preserve the attributes of the input datasets. This is, however, not the case for all work!ow modules. We drop this assumption, and show in this paper how the Web can be harvested to answer why-not queries against workflow provenance.

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    LabelFlow: Exploiting Workflow Provenance to Surface Scientific Data Provenance 
    Alper, Pinar; Belhajjame, Khalid; Goble, Carole; Karagoz, pinar (2015) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    UP & DOWN: Improving Provenance Precision by Combining Workflow- and Trace-Level Information 
    Dey, Saumen; Belhajjame, Khalid; Koop, David; Song, Tianhong; Missier, Paolo; Ludäscher, Bertram (2014) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    SHARP: Harmonizing and Bridging Cross-Workflow Provenance 
    Gaignard, Alban; Belhajjame, Khalid; Skaf-Molli, Hala (2017) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Lineage-Preserving Anonymization of the Provenance of Collection-Based Workflows 
    Belhajjame, Khalid (2020) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    On the Anonymization of Workflow Provenance without Compromising the Transparency of Lineage 
    Belhajjame, Khalid (2022) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo