From rough to multifractal volatility: The log S-fBM model
Wu, Peng; Muzy, Jean-François; Bacry, Emmanuel (2022), From rough to multifractal volatility: The log S-fBM model, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 604. 10.1016/j.physa.2022.127919
View/ Open
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publiéDate
2022Journal name
Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its ApplicationsVolume
604Publication identifier
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor(s)
Wu, PengCEntre de REcherches en MAthématiques de la DEcision [CEREMADE]
Muzy, Jean-François

Sciences pour l'environnement [SPE]
Bacry, Emmanuel

CEntre de REcherches en MAthématiques de la DEcision [CEREMADE]
Abstract (EN)
We introduce a family of random measures MH,T ( dt), namely log S-fBM, suchthat, for H > 0, MH,T ( dt) = e ωH,T (t) dt where ωH,T (t) is a Gaussian process that can be considered as a stationary version of an H-fractional Brownian motion. Moreover, when H → 0, one has MH,T ( dt) → MfT ( dt) (in the weak sense) where MfT ( dt) is the celebrated log-normal multifractal random measure (MRM). Thus, this model allows us to consider, within the same framework, the two popular classes of ultifractal (H = 0) and rough volatility (0 < H < 1/2) models. The main properties of the log S-fBM are discussed and their estimation issues are addressed. We notably show that the direct estimation of H from the scaling properties of ln(MH,T ([t, t+τ ])), at fixed τ , can lead to strongly over-estimating the value of H. We propose a better GMM estimation method which is shown to be valid in the high-frequency asymptotic regime. When applied to a large set of empirical volatility data, we observe that stock indices have values around H = 0.1 while individual stocks are characterized by values of H that can be very close to 0 and thus well described by a MRM. We also bring evidence that unlike the log-volatility variance ν 2 whose estimation appears to be poorly reliable (though used widely in the rough volatility literature), the estimation of the so-called ”intermittency coefficient” λ 2, which is the product of ν 2 and the Hurst exponent H, appears to be far more reliable leading to valuesSubjects / Keywords
Rough volatility; Multifractal volatility; Fractional Brownian motion; GMM estimation; Intermittency coefficientRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Wu, Peng; Rambaldi, Marcello; Muzy, Jean-François; Bacry, Emmanuel (2019) Document de travail / Working paper
-
Rambaldi, Marcello; Bacry, Emmanuel; Muzy, Jean-François (2019) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Achab, Massil; Bacry, Emmanuel; Gaïffas, Stéphane; Mastromatteo, Iacopo; Muzy, Jean-François (2017) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Muzy, Jean-François; Delattre, Sylvain; Hoffmann, Marc; Bacry, Emmanuel (2013) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Muzy, Jean-François; Hoffmann, Marc; Delattre, Sylvain; Bacry, Emmanuel (2013) Article accepté pour publication ou publié