• français
    • English
  • English 
    • français
    • English
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
BIRD Home

Browse

This CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

R&D Accounting Treatment: A European Perspective

Thumbnail
Date
2003
Dewey
Contrôle de gestion Comptabilité
Sujet
Accounting
JEL code
M41; O3
Conference name
26th annual congress European Accounting Association
Conference date
04-2003
Conference city
Séville
Conference country
Espagne
URI
https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/2358
Collections
  • DRM : Publications
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Jeanjean, Thomas
Cazavan-Jeny, Anne
Type
Communication / Conférence
Abstract (EN)
Accounting for research and development (R&D) costs is an open issue. SFAS n°2 mandates that all R&D costs are immediately expensed. International standards prescribe a capitalization of R&D costs if they meet certain criteria (IAS 38). The cost method is perfectly objective and verifiable. The capitalization of R&D costs may be used to convey information but is also less reliable. There is a trade off between reliability and objectivity. Nevertheless recent research papers (Healy, Howe and Myers, 2002; Lev and Sougiannis, 1996, 1999; Aboody and Lev, 1998) show that capitalization of intangibles (R&D costs and software development costs) is value relevant. However critics can be leveled at this result because their empirical tests are based on simulated or partial data. Our purpose is to test empirically R&D accounting issues on a sample of European firms. Many European accounting regulatory bodies authorize both accounting treatments for R&D costs: expensed as incurred or capitalized and amortized. First, we study the factors influencing the choice of an R&D accounting method. Secondly, we examine the value relevance of earnings and book values according to the R&D accounting treatment. This paper extends previous literature by using real data on capitalized R&D, instead of estimated data. Moreover hypotheses are tested in a European institutional environment whereas previous studies were carried out on US firms. Finally, we introduce measures of value relevance not commonly used in the field of Intangibles.

  • Accueil Bibliothèque
  • Site de l'Université Paris-Dauphine
  • Contact
SCD Paris Dauphine - Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16

 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 France (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) license.