• français
    • English
  • English 
    • français
    • English
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
BIRD Home

Browse

This CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Finance and Politics: The Break of the 1970s

Thumbnail
Date
2013
Dewey
Sociologie économique
Sujet
trusts
Conference name
24th SASE conference- mini-conference “States within the Categories of Financial Stability”, University of Milan
Conference date
06-2013
Conference city
Milan
Conference country
Italy
URI
https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/20261
Collections
  • IRISSO : Publications
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Montagne, Sabine
184082 Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales [IRISSO]
Type
Communication / Conférence
Abstract (EN)
Regulating Trusts’ investing has long been used by legislatures to finance state activities. In the 19th century, the legal concept of prudence led trustees to invest in State bonds, sometimes in railroads securities favoured by politicians. Stocks were generally prohibited since considered too risky. These rules were both justified by the specific protection due to the Trust’s beneficiary and useful for the economic development of the community. So, the moral purpose of the Trust (protecting weak persons) was achieved by benefiting the whole community (financing infrastructure, utilities).This virtuous nexus has been revisited by federal statutes in the 20th century. During the New Deal, the securities laws tended to improve the market functioning. In the 1960s-70s, stock market was rehabilitated. The idea of financing welfare through private pension and health plans managed by financial intermediaries was articulated with the idea that this new actors were capable of allocating assets in the right direction which would boost the American economy. Finance was given two duties: financing welfare and directing the economy. Some sponsors of the new concept of “responsible investment” yet began to add to this virtuous picture another requirement: institutional investing was not to hurt the community. In the 2000s, academics launched the concept of the “universal owners”. Those are large institutional investors with large diversified portfolios holding the entire economy. They should be consequently in charge of the economic future of the USA. They should act like politicians, worried about industrial policies.So, finance and politics have experienced a long history in the USA. The quasi moral duty of finance, and the virtuous nexus which is associated with, has been dramatically challenged by the duty to diversify and the Modern Portfolio Theory. By the 1960s, this new definition of diversification was attacked by traditional financial practitioners as “un-american” since it was supposed to undermine the responsibility of the financiers, place the market above all and deny the free will. The new paradigm seemed to condemn any attempt to politicize investing.I will explore the context, conditions and actors of this battle which opposed conflicting conceptions of investing during the 1960s-70s. The main question is why and how economic actors (corporate managers, financial practitioners, regulators and courts) have changed their mind and finally agreed with these “un-american” practices.

  • Accueil Bibliothèque
  • Site de l'Université Paris-Dauphine
  • Contact
SCD Paris Dauphine - Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16

 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 France (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) license.