• français
    • English
  • français 
    • français
    • English
  • Connexion
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
Accueil

Afficher

Cette collectionPar Date de CréationAuteursTitresSujetsNoms de revueToute la baseCentres de recherche & CollectionsPar Date de CréationAuteursTitresSujetsNoms de revue

Mon compte

Connexion

Statistiques

Afficher les statistiques d'usage

Competition and Investment: What do we know from the literature?

Thumbnail
Ouvrir
Competition_and_Investment.pdf (318.2Kb)
Date
2014-03
Ville de l'éditeur
Toulouse
Nom de l'éditeur
Institut d'économie industrielle
Date de parution de l'ouvrage
03-2014
Titre de la collection
Rapport IDEI
n° dans la collection
24
Indexation documentaire
Microéconomie
Subject
investment; economic growth; market structures; investment; competition
Code JEL
D.D9.D90; D.D8.D83; D.D4.D46
URI
https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/20166
Collections
  • LEDa : Publications
Métadonnées
Afficher la notice complète
Auteur
Sand-Zantman, Wilfried
status unknown
Mathis, Jérôme
163511 Laboratoire d'Economie de Dauphine [LEDa]
Type
Rapport
Nombre de pages du document
31
Résumé en anglais
The link between competition and investment is one of the most important relationshipsexamined in economics. For more than two centuries economists have held conflicting viewsof which market structures create the most favorable environment for economic growth, whileacknowledging that it benefits from investment in both infrastructure and innovation.According to Adam Smith’s fundamental lessons, competition guarantees that consumers’needs are best satisfied, minimizing the rents left to the firms. Economists of the Austrianschool have criticized this view and instead emphasized that even more important than thecompetition structure is the competitive process. An even more skeptical view was offered bySchumpeter who argued that concentrated market structures are optimal and monopoly rentsare a driving force that promotes economic growth.A parallel can be drawn between innovation and investment which then gives rise to twoconflicting effects of competition on investment. First, strong product market competitiondecreases profits and then lowers incentives to innovate. Second, competition may providefirms with incentives to innovate to escape from competition in the product market. This“escape competition” effect dominates when the ex-post market power is relatively high whilethe opposite holds when the market is more competitive. The two effects are embedded in theinverse U-shaped curve between competition and innovation developed by Aghion et al.(2005) so the optimal degree of competition is intermediate.A look at the investment in infrastructure also offers a contrasted view on the benefits ofcompetition. Alesina et al. (2005) studied the role that overall regulation, barriers to entry andpublic ownership play in investment for many nonmanufacturing industries (energy,transports, communication). They showed that competition-enhancing policies do promoteinvestment. But studies more focused on the (fixed-line) telecommunications sector havehighlighted a possible negative impact on network investment when market entry is promotedthrough local loop unbundling. Additionally, the impact of unbundling -- which can be seenas a competition-enhancing policy – on penetration rate is still under debate but seems to be atbest negligible.Therefore, the impact of competition on investment depends both on precise competitionenhancing measures and the type of investment at stake.

  • Accueil Bibliothèque
  • Site de l'Université Paris-Dauphine
  • Contact
SCD Paris Dauphine - Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16

 Cette création est mise à disposition sous un contrat Creative Commons.