Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierDauphine Recherches en Management [DRM]
dc.contributor.authorde Vaujany, François-Xavier*
hal.structure.identifierLille économie management - UMR 9221 [LEM]
dc.contributor.authorLeclercq-Vandelanoitte, Aurélie
HAL ID: 741662
ORCID: 0000-0003-2940-831X
*
hal.structure.identifierCopenhagen Business School
dc.contributor.authorHolt, Robin*
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-23T13:44:16Z
dc.date.available2019-04-23T13:44:16Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1056-4926
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/18742
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectplatformen
dc.subjectcommunityen
dc.subjectplatform capitalismen
dc.subjectparadoxen
dc.subjectchiasmen
dc.subjectorganizationen
dc.subjectphenomenologyen
dc.subjecttechnologyen
dc.subjectdigitalen
dc.subjectcollaborative economyen
dc.subject.ddc658.4en
dc.subject.classificationjelL.L1.L14en
dc.subject.classificationjelO.O3.O33en
dc.subject.classificationjelP.P1.P12en
dc.titleCommunities versus platforms: The paradox in the body of the collaborative economyen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenCommunities and platforms pervade all aspects of the collaborative economy. Yet, they exist in apparent tension. The collaborative economy is grounded in communities. These are typically characterized by isonomic relations, in which the singularity of members finds its distinctiveness in being woven into mutual, collective endeavor. Yet, the collaborative economy also entails digital platforms organized through largely heteronomic relations in which employees and users are configured as isolate, useful, interchangeable, and flexible “units.” As such, communities and platforms are traditionally framed as separate from, and in contradiction to, one another. There is, it seems a paradox at the heart of the collaborative economy. Yet, inspired by the work of Merleau-Ponty, we argue the expression, embodiment, and eventfulness characterizing the collaborative economy show communities and platforms being constituted by one another. We conclude that the paradox, far from being a condition of opposition and dialectical tension requiring managed resolution, is a generative organizational process.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameJournal of Management Inquiry
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2019-02
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1177/1056492619832119en
dc.contributor.countryeditoruniversityotherDENMARK
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherSageen
dc.subject.ddclabelKnowledge Managementen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintouien
dc.description.ssrncandidatenonen
dc.description.halcandidateouien
dc.description.readershiprechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.date.updated2019-04-05T09:47:32Z
hal.identifierhal-02107247*
hal.version1*
hal.update.actionupdateMetadata*
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record