• français
    • English
  • English 
    • français
    • English
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
BIRD Home

Browse

This CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies - With an application to wetland prioritization

Thumbnail
Date
2019
Dewey
Recherche opérationnelle
Sujet
Environmental policy; Prioritization; Multi-criteria decision-analysis; Legitimacy; Wetlands; Knowledge-implementation gaps
Journal issue
Science of The Total Environment
Volume
655
Publication date
03-2019
Article pages
384-394
Publisher
Elsevier
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.202
URI
https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/18382
Collections
  • LAMSADE : Publications
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Choulak, Mourad
989 Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Marage, Damien
1096 Laboratoire Dynamiques Sociales et Recomposition des Espaces [LADYSS]
Gisbert, Manon
115536 autre
Paris, Mélanie
115536 autre
Meinard, Yves
989 Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Abstract (EN)
Environmental policies are implemented in complex socio-economic settings, where numerous stakeholders hold different and potentially conflicting values. In addition to being scientifically well-founded, the experts' recommendations on which these policies are based therefore also need to be operational and legitimate.Multi-criteria decision-analysis (MCDA) is often used to solve management problems, but studies in the literature rarely place importance on the way stakeholders perceive researchers' interventions (which implies a lack of legitimacy), and most managers lack the skills to reproduce routinely the operations involved (which implies a lack of operationality). We use MCDA methodology in a different approach: “meta-decision-analysis” (Meta-DA). As researchers, instead of striving to identify the best way for us to solve managers' problems, we identify the actors (the decision-aid providers, DAPs) who are best placed to help managers, and we provide DAPs with the necessary tools.

  • Accueil Bibliothèque
  • Site de l'Université Paris-Dauphine
  • Contact
SCD Paris Dauphine - Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16

 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 France (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) license.