• xmlui.mirage2.page-structure.header.title
    • français
    • English
  • Help
  • Login
  • Language 
    • Français
    • English
View Item 
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
  •   BIRD Home
  • LAMSADE (UMR CNRS 7243)
  • LAMSADE : Publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Browse

BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesTypeThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesType

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors
Thumbnail - Request a copy

A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies - With an application to wetland prioritization

Choulak, Mourad; Marage, Damien; Gisbert, Manon; Paris, Mélanie; Meinard, Yves (2019), A meta-decision-analysis approach to structure operational and legitimate environmental policies - With an application to wetland prioritization, Science of The Total Environment, 655, p. 384-394. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.202

Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Date
2019
Journal name
Science of The Total Environment
Volume
655
Publisher
Elsevier
Pages
384-394
Publication identifier
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.202
Metadata
Show full item record
Author(s)
Choulak, Mourad
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Marage, Damien cc
Laboratoire Dynamiques Sociales et Recomposition des Espaces [LADYSS]
Gisbert, Manon
autre
Paris, Mélanie
autre
Meinard, Yves
Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Abstract (EN)
Environmental policies are implemented in complex socio-economic settings, where numerous stakeholders hold different and potentially conflicting values. In addition to being scientifically well-founded, the experts' recommendations on which these policies are based therefore also need to be operational and legitimate.Multi-criteria decision-analysis (MCDA) is often used to solve management problems, but studies in the literature rarely place importance on the way stakeholders perceive researchers' interventions (which implies a lack of legitimacy), and most managers lack the skills to reproduce routinely the operations involved (which implies a lack of operationality). We use MCDA methodology in a different approach: “meta-decision-analysis” (Meta-DA). As researchers, instead of striving to identify the best way for us to solve managers' problems, we identify the actors (the decision-aid providers, DAPs) who are best placed to help managers, and we provide DAPs with the necessary tools.
Subjects / Keywords
Environmental policy; Prioritization; Multi-criteria decision-analysis; Legitimacy; Wetlands; Knowledge-implementation gaps

Related items

Showing items related by title and author.

  • Thumbnail
    How AI could help physicians during their medical consultations: An analysis of physicians' decision process to develop efficient decision support systems for medical consultations 
    Richard, Antoine; Mayag, Brice; Meinard, Yves; Talbot, François; Tsoukiàs, Alexis (2018) Communication / Conférence
  • Thumbnail
    Analysing constraints to improve conservation decision-making: a theoretical framework and its application to the Northern Vosges, France 
    Mangos, Anai; Rouchier, Juliette; Meinard, Yves (2021) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    What is policy analytics? An exploration of 5 years of environmental management applications 
    Meinard, Yves; Barreteau, Olivier; Boschet, Christophe; Daniell, Katherine; Ferrand, Nils; Girard, Sabine; Guillaume, Joseph; Hassenforder, E.; Lord, Matthew; Merad, Myriam; Nabavi, Ehsan; Petitjean, Claire; Pluchinotta, Irene; Rouchier, Juliette; Tsoukias, A.; Zaraté, P. (2020) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
  • Thumbnail
    What is legitimate Decision Support? 
    Meinard, Yves; Tsoukiàs, Alexis (2022) Chapitre d'ouvrage
  • Thumbnail
    Adapting participatory processes to fine‐tune conservation approaches in multiactor decision settings 
    Buchs, Arnaud; Hassenforder, Emeline; Meinard, Yves (2019) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Dauphine PSL Bibliothèque logo
Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16
Phone: 01 44 05 40 94
Contact
Dauphine PSL logoEQUIS logoCreative Commons logo