• français
    • English
  • English 
    • français
    • English
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
BIRD Home

Browse

This CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Arguing about constitutive and regulative norms

Thumbnail
Date
2018
Dewey
Recherche opérationnelle
Sujet
Normative reasoning; deontic logic; argumentation; input/output logic
Journal issue
Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics
Volume
28
Number
2-3
Publication date
09-2018
Article pages
189-217
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
DOI
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/11663081.2018.1487242
URI
https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/18139
Collections
  • LAMSADE : Publications
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Pigozzi, Gabriella
989 Laboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
van der Torre, Leendert
139864 University of Luxembourg, Computer Science Department
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Abstract (EN)
Formal arguments are often represented by (support, conclusion) pairs, but in this paper we consider normative arguments represented by sequences of (brute, institutional, deontic) triples, where constitutive norms derive institutional facts from brute facts, and regulative norms derive deontic facts like obligations and permissions from institutional facts. The institutional facts may be seen as the reasons explaining or warranting the deontic obligations and permissions, and therefore they can be attacked by other normative arguments too. We represent different aspects of normative reasoning by different kinds of consistency checks among these triples, and we use formal argumentation theory to resolve conflicts among such normative arguments. In particular, we introduce various requirements for arguing about norms concerning violations, contrary-to-duty obligations, dilemmas, conflict resolution and different kinds of norms, and we introduce a formal argumentation theory satisfying the requirements. In order to illustrate our framework, we introduce a running example based on university regulations for prospective and actual students.

  • Accueil Bibliothèque
  • Site de l'Université Paris-Dauphine
  • Contact
SCD Paris Dauphine - Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16

 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 France (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) license.