Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCisse, Fatou*
dc.contributor.authorFofana, Ismael*
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-27T13:14:39Z
dc.date.available2018-04-27T13:14:39Z
dc.date.issued2016-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/17712
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectTradeen
dc.subjectgrowthen
dc.subjectpovertyen
dc.subjectWest Africaen
dc.subjecteconomy wide modelen
dc.subject.ddc337en
dc.subject.classificationjelF.F4.F43en
dc.subject.classificationjelI.I3.I35en
dc.subject.classificationjelO.O5en
dc.titleThe Growth and Poverty Impact of the West African Free Trade Agreement with the European Unionen
dc.typeDocument de travail / Working paper
dc.description.abstractenThe Cotonou Agreement concluded in June 2000 between the European Union (EU) and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) ended successive Lome regimes and paved the way for an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) consistent with the World Trade Organization (WTO) rules. Non reciprocal trade agreements which form the basis of EU and ACP trade relations are contrary to the Most Favored Nation (MFN) principle under the WTO. The aim of the EPA is to make EU and ACP trade relations consistent with WTO legal requirements. The EPA aims to create a Free Trade Area (FTA) between West Africa (WA) and the European Union (EU). Thus, countries in the sub-region are expected to open their domestic market to 75 % of the EU products over a period of 20 years. Apart from the gradual removal of barriers to trade, EU and ECOWAS agreed within the framework of EPA to design development programs to enable the region to adapt to the new trade environment created by the liberalization of trade with Europe. In our paper, the impact on West Africa of the Free Trade Agreement between EU and ECOWAS is analyzed against a baseline scenario where west african economies have already adopted the ECOWAS Common External Tariff. Compared to previous studies, our methodology adds value by combining a dynamic macro- micro multicountry model to assess the short, medium and long term impacts of the FTAs on fiscal revenues, trade balance, growth, and poverty. We simulate three realistic scenarios of 65 percent and 70 percent of market access over a period of 25 years. The first scenario involved a 70 percent liberalization of imports from EU over a period of 25 years, with 45 percent over the first 15 years. The second scenario assumes 70 percent of liberalization of imports from EU over a period of 25 years, with 64 percent during the first 15 years. Finally, the third scenario concerns 65 percent liberalization of imports from EU over a 25 years period, with 45 percent during the first 15 years. Using Social Accounting Matrices (SAM) as accounting framework for basic data, our study uses a dynamic multi-country Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model that takes into consideration the structure of each of the economies as well as all interactions existing between countries within the subregion. To address the poverty impact, we develop a poverty module for ten countries for which survey data was available and link it to the CGE modeling a top-down fashion. The simulation results indicate that, without any companying program, liberalizing 65 percent of imports from the EU boosts growth and contributes to reduce poverty in WA. However, WA faces more pressure when the liberalization reaches 70 percent of imports, leading to a slower growth rate and an increase of poverty. The deterioration of the trade balance and the loss of Government revenue come out as the main cause of the economic slowdown under the simulated FTA scenarios. This general picture of the growth impact of the FTA scenarios hides significant disparities among economies in the subregion. The growth rate accelerates in four countries: Côte d’Ivoire, Ghana, Niger, and Benin; it slowdowns in five other countries: Nigeria, Senegal, Togo, Cape Verde, and GuineaBissau; and finally a stagnation of the growth rate is observed in the remaining countries considered in the study: Burkina Faso, Mali, and Guinea. Nigeria’ economy paid the highest price for a greater opening up of the WA’s market to the EU products, i.e. from 65 to 70 percent of liberalization. A faster pace of tariff reductions - from 45 to 65 percent during the first 15 years - widens disparities among economies in the subregion. With a accompanying policies program of producing energy and transport infrastructure, the simulations indicate better impacts of the FTA in term of growth rate and poverty reduction in all the countries. Our findings indicate also that, implementing the FTAs would lead to a trade diversion in favor of the EU at the expense of other trading partners. The simulations show that the FTA have little impact of the interregional trade as it remains relatively constant. The findings show that accompanying programs to boost competitivity of the west african firms during the liberalisation processes must be taken place.en
dc.identifier.citationpages26en
dc.relation.ispartofseriestitleNOPOOR Working Paper
dc.relation.ispartofseriesnumber38
dc.subject.ddclabelEconomie internationaleen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenonen
dc.description.halcandidatenonen
dc.description.readershiprechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
hal.person.labIds441412*
hal.person.labIds441412*


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Projet Nopoor
    Projet européen NOPOOR Enhancing Knowledge for Renewed Policies against Poverty

Show simple item record