Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAgnetis, Alessandro*
dc.contributor.authorAloulou, Mohamed Ali*
dc.contributor.authorFu, Liangliang*
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-28T13:22:49Z
dc.date.available2017-08-28T13:22:49Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn0925-5273
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/16633
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSupply chain schedulingen
dc.subjectBatching and deliveryen
dc.subjectOutsourced distributionen
dc.subjectTwo delivery modesen
dc.subjectDominance and cooperationen
dc.subjectBenefit of cooperationen
dc.subjectFairnessen
dc.subject.ddc658.7en
dc.titleProduction and interplant batch delivery scheduling: Dominance and cooperationen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenIn this paper, we consider scheduling problems in a supply chain with two agents, a manufacturer and a third-party logistics (3PL) provider. The manufacturer has to process a set of jobs at the upstream stage and at the downstream stage. The 3PL provider is in charge of transportation of semi-finished products from the upstream stage to the downstream stage. The manufacturer's objective is to minimize makespan and the 3PL provider's objective is to minimize transportation cost TC. We investigate three scenarios, corresponding to different types of contract: (i) decentralized scenario with strict responsiveness; (ii) decentralized scenario with flexible responsiveness; (iii) centralized (cooperative) scenario. We provide exact polynomial-time algorithms or prove the NP-completeness of the scheduling problems in these three scenarios. Moreover, we evaluate and compare various scenarios through a large set of computational experiments. The results show that cooperation may bring significant benefits to both actors. The benefit for the 3PL provider is particularly high if compared to situations in which the manufacturing sequence is fixed. Also the manufacturer can benefit from relaxing the job-by-job responsiveness constraint in favor of an integrated schedule which appropriately accounts for the role of the 3PL provider.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameInternational Journal of Production Economics
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol182en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2016
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages38-49en
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.007en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevieren
dc.subject.ddclabelGestion des stocksen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenonen
dc.description.halcandidateouien
dc.description.readershiprechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.date.updated2017-07-24T13:59:47Z
hal.person.labIds124339*
hal.person.labIds989*
hal.person.labIds989*
hal.identifierhal-01593561*


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record