Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeton, Hélène
dc.contributor.authorBlanc, Antoine
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-15T09:25:11Z
dc.date.available2017-03-15T09:25:11Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/16343
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectasbestos
dc.subjectdeinstitutionalisation
dc.subjectinstitutional maintenance
dc.subjectprofiles of action
dc.subject.ddc658.4en
dc.subject.classificationjelI.I1.I10en
dc.subject.classificationjelL.L3.L32en
dc.subject.classificationjelJ.J2.J28en
dc.subject.classificationjelJ.J8.J81en
dc.titleUnderstanding the pace of deinstitutionalisation: the role and nature of cumulative actions
dc.typeCommunication / Conférence
dc.contributor.editoruniversityotherUniversité Paris-Est Créteil
dc.description.abstractenEven when accelerated by a jolt, deinstitutionalization is most often a long process constituted by short timestep and long timestep periods. Little has been said however to explain the pace of deinstitutionalization and the factors that may accelerate or slow down this process. Not only strategic actions contribute to deinstitutionalization. Multiple actions are implied and impact on the pace of deinstitutionalization, depending on efforts of maintenance and disruption which may be opposed, isolated or cumulated. Based on Dorado’s model of profiles of actions in institutional change, we draw out some core claims: (1) the pace of deinstitutionalization is all the slower when defensive actions are related to a Leveraging-Strategic actions; (2) The interaction between Leverage-Strategic actions and Accumulating-Sensemaking actions explains the creation of residues that will be later essential to disrupt an institution; (3) The long timestep periods of deinstitutionalization are related to disruptive agency’s tendency to be weakened and scattered, due to a lack of strategic vision from disruptive actors. Finally we present “convening” as an efficient profile of action to considerably slow down a deinstitutionalization process. The argumentation is supported by an historical analysis of the deinstitutionalization of asbestos in France during the 20th century.
dc.subject.ddclabelDirection d'entreprisesen
dc.relation.conftitle76 th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management
dc.relation.confcityLos Angeles
dc.relation.confcountryUNITED STATES
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.date.updated2018-04-27T16:58:09Z
hal.person.labIds176728*
hal.person.labIds1032*
hal.identifierhal-01497968*


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record