Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHussenot, Anthony
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-09T13:48:19Z
dc.date.available2017-03-09T13:48:19Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1934-8835
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/16310
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectrelated areasen
dc.subjectCompromisesen
dc.subjectProcess studiesen
dc.subjectorganization theoriesen
dc.subjectOrganizingen
dc.subjectorganizational behavioren
dc.subjectstrategic managementen
dc.subject.ddc658.4en
dc.subject.classificationjelM.M5.M54en
dc.subject.classificationjelM.M1.M12en
dc.subject.classificationjelL.L2.L20en
dc.titleToward a process and situated view of compromisesen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenTo understand how collaborative work practices emerge and evolve throughout activities, the purpose of this paper is to comprehend the making of compromises from a process view. Compromises are here understood as constantly evolving throughout activities. Design/methodology/approach: The author relies on the Actor-Network Theory to define two dynamics participating in the making of compromises: the translation and the association. These two dynamics are then illustrated with a case study about the development of a Human Resource Management device that took place in a bank in Luxembourg. From this case, the author focuses on the emergence of various compromises about the project’s purpose. Findings: Based on the insights brought by the theoretical framework and case studies, compromise is understood as a temporary result of the translations and associations between humans and non-humans. Compromise is also anything that is shared by actors (meaning, categories, objectives, etc). that enables them to make their collective activity possible. This process view of compromises makes three contributions: it fully recognizes that compromise is not stable but situated in practices, it highlights the mediating role of compromises and it insists on the interrelation between compromises throughout the activity. Originality/value: The matter of compromise has mainly been studied from a moral standpoint as a stable agreement, whatever the context. This article also provides an alternative approach to understanding compromise as situated in practices.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameInternational Journal of Organizational Analysis
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol24en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue5en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2016
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages835-855en
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1108/IJOA-01-2015-0838en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherInderscience Enterprisesen
dc.subject.ddclabelDirection d'entreprisesen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenonen
dc.description.halcandidateouien
dc.description.readershiprechercheen
dc.description.audienceInternationalen
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedouien
dc.date.updated2017-03-09T13:36:45Z
hal.person.labIds1032
hal.identifierhal-01485870*


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record