Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGiordano, Raffaele
dc.contributor.authorPagano, Alessandro
dc.contributor.authorPluchinotta, Irene
dc.contributor.authorVurro, Michele
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-10T16:11:34Z
dc.date.available2017-02-10T16:11:34Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/16250
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSystem dynamic model
dc.subjectWater supply systems
dc.subjectResilience
dc.subjectTOSE approach
dc.subjectL’Aquila Earthquake
dc.subject.ddc333en
dc.subject.classificationjelQ54en
dc.subject.classificationjelQ25en
dc.titleDrinking water supply in resilient cities: Notes from L’Aquila earthquake case study
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.contributor.editoruniversityotherCNR-IRSA
dc.description.abstractenDisasters impacts on urban environment are the result of interactions among natural and human systems, which are intimately linked each other. What is more, cities are directly dependent on infrastructures providing essential services (Lifeline Systems, LS). The operation of LS in ordinary conditions as well as after disasters is crucial. Among the LS, drinking water supply deserves a critical role for citizens. The present work summarizes some preliminary activities related to an ongoing EU funded researchproject. The main aim of the paper is to define a System Dynamic Model (SDM) to assess the evolution of resilience of a drinking water supply system in case of natural disasters, with particular attention to the role of both ‘structural’ and ‘non-structural’ parameters. Reflections are carried out on L’Aquila (Italy) case study, since drinking water infrastructures were significantly stressed during the 2009 earthquake, causing a limited functionality in the aftermath of the event. Furthermore, the reallocation of citizens in temporary shelters determined a change in the demand pattern, requiring a dynamic adaptation of the infrastructure. Based on an innovative approach to resilience, the model was developed also to simulate different emergency management scenarios, corresponding to different disaster management strategies.
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameSustainable Cities and Society
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol28
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2017
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages435-449
dc.relation.isversionofdoi10.1016/j.scs.2016.09.005
dc.contributor.countryeditoruniversityotherITALY
dc.subject.ddclabelEconomie de la terre et des ressources naturellesen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedoui
dc.date.updated2017-02-20T17:28:03Z
hal.person.labIds3331
hal.person.labIds989
hal.person.labIds3331
hal.person.labIds65765
hal.identifierhal-01465018*


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record