Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMoretti, Stefano*
dc.contributor.authorOzturk, Meltem*
dc.contributor.authorTsoukiàs, Alexis*
dc.date.accessioned2016-11-25T15:02:36Z
dc.date.available2016-11-25T15:02:36Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/15999
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectPreference modelling
dc.subjectDecision aiding
dc.subjectUncertainty
dc.subjectFuzzy sets
dc.subjectOrdered relations
dc.subjectBinary relations
dc.subjectPreference extensions
dc.subject.ddc003en
dc.subject.classificationjelC.C4.C44en
dc.titlePreference Modelling
dc.typeChapitre d'ouvrage
dc.description.abstractenThis chapter provides the reader with a presentation of preference modelling fundamental notions as well as some recent results in this field. Preference modelling is an inevitable step in a variety of fields: economy, sociology, psychology, mathematical programming, even medicine, archaeology, and obviously decision analysis. Our notation and some basic definitions, such as those of binary relation, properties and ordered sets, are presented at the beginning of the chapter. We start by discussing different reasons for constructing a preference model. We then go through a number of issues that influence the construction of preference models. Different formalisations besides classical logic such as fuzzy sets and non-classical logics become necessary. We then present different types of preference structures reflecting the behavior of a decision-maker: classical, extended and valued ones. It is relevant to have a numerical representation of preferences: functional representations, value functions. The concepts of thresholds and minimal representation are also introduced in this section. We also deal with the problem of how to extend a preference relation over a set A of “objects” to the set of all subsets of A. In Sect. 3.9, we briefly explore the concept of deontic logic (logic of preference) and other formalisms associated with “compact representation of preferences” introduced for special purposes. We end the chapter with some concluding remarks.
dc.identifier.citationpages43-95
dc.relation.ispartoftitleMultiple Criteria Decision Analysis
dc.relation.ispartofeditorSalvatore Greco, Matthias Ehrgott, José Rui Figueira
dc.relation.ispartofpublnameSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofpublcityBerlin Heidelberg
dc.relation.ispartofdate2016
dc.identifier.urlsitehttp://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_3
dc.subject.ddclabelRecherche opérationnelleen
dc.relation.ispartofisbn978-1-4939-3093-7
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_3
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.date.updated2019-11-12T14:48:07Z
hal.person.labIds*
hal.person.labIds*
hal.person.labIds*
hal.identifierhal-01403262*


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record