The Complexity of Repairing, Adjusting, and Aggregating of Extensions in Abstract Argumentation
Kim, Eun Jung; Ordyniak, Sebastian; Szeider, Stefan (2014), The Complexity of Repairing, Adjusting, and Aggregating of Extensions in Abstract Argumentation, in Black, Elizabeth; Modgil, Sanjay; Oren, Nir, Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation; Second International Workshop, TAFA 2013, Beijing, China, August 3-5, 2013, Revised Selected papers, Springer : Berlin, p. 158-175. 10.1007/978-3-642-54373-9_11
Type
Communication / ConférenceExternal document link
http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.6109v1Date
2014Conference title
Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation; Second International Workshop, TAFA 2013Conference date
2013-08Conference city
BeijingConference country
ChinaBook title
Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation; Second International Workshop, TAFA 2013, Beijing, China, August 3-5, 2013, Revised Selected papersBook author
Black, Elizabeth; Modgil, Sanjay; Oren, NirPublisher
Springer
Published in
Berlin
ISBN
978-3-642-54372-2
Number of pages
209Pages
158-175
Publication identifier
Metadata
Show full item recordAuthor(s)
Kim, Eun JungLaboratoire d'analyse et modélisation de systèmes pour l'aide à la décision [LAMSADE]
Ordyniak, Sebastian
Szeider, Stefan
Institute of Information Systems
Abstract (EN)
We study the computational complexity of problems that arise in abstract argumentation in the context of dynamic argumentation, minimal change, and aggregation. In particular, we consider the following problems where always an argumentation framework F and a small positive integer k are given. The Repair problem asks whether a given set of arguments can be modified into an extension by at most k elementary changes (i.e., the extension is of distance k from the given set). The Adjust problem asks whether a given extension can be modified by at most k elementary changes into an extension that contains a specified argument. The Center problem asks whether, given two extensions of distance k, whether there is a “center” extension that is of distance at most k − 1 from both given extensions. We study these problems in the framework of parameterized complexity, and take the distance k as the parameter. Our results cover several different semantics, including admissible, complete, preferred, semi-stable and stable semantics.Subjects / Keywords
semantic; dynamic argumentation; abstract argumentationRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Gaspers, Serge; Kim, Eun Jung; Ordyniak, Sebastian; Saurabh, Saket; Szeider, Stefan (2012) Communication / Conférence
-
Kim, Eun Jung; Ordyniak, Sebastian (2012) Chapitre d'ouvrage
-
Bonnet, Édouard; Foucaud, Florent; Kim, Eun Jung; Sikora, Florian (2015) Communication / Conférence
-
Dell, Holger; Kim, Eun Jung; Lampis, Michael; Mitsou, Valia; Mömke, Tobias (2017) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Bonnet, Édouard; Foucaud, Florent; Kim, Eun Jung; Sikora, Florian (2018) Article accepté pour publication ou publié