Show simple item record

hal.structure.identifierNormandie Innovation Marché Entreprise Consommation [NIMEC]
dc.contributor.authorAdam-Ledunois, Sonia
HAL ID: 13928
ORCID: 0000-0002-9921-4812
*
hal.structure.identifierDauphine Recherches en Management [DRM]
dc.contributor.authorCanet, Emilie*
hal.structure.identifierDauphine Recherches en Management [DRM]
dc.contributor.authorDamart, Sébastien
HAL ID: 53
*
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-24T17:35:58Z
dc.date.available2016-02-24T17:35:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/15402
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectSocial innovation
dc.subjectBusiness models
dc.subjectParadoxical situations
dc.subjectConflicts
dc.subject.ddc658.4en
dc.subject.classificationjelM.M1.M19en
dc.subject.classificationjelO.O3.O32en
dc.titleFrom richer business model to social innovation: the case of relocation assistance to seniors
dc.typeCommunication / Conférence
dc.description.abstractenOrganizations in the field of social innovation management are characterized by dilemmas and contradictions. Business models (BM) that develop within the contexts of these organizations are specific: they result from compromises sometimes difficult to sustain. For some of these organizations, the business model on which they are built is symptomatic of paradoxical situations. For some social innovation based businesses, we hypothesize that the evolution of the BM is partly the result of paradoxes and conflicts between social utility values and economic performance requirements, which the entrepreneur has to face. We use the concept of ethical stress and the concept of organizational paradox for the analysis of a case: the trajectory of the BM of a company, which did not lay within the social innovation field at first. Faced with certain tensions between the nature of its activity, the entrepreneur’s values and the initial BM, the company gradually moved toward the social innovation field to become a social enterprise as defined below. We highlight the trajectory of the BM and we propose a way to explain it that is based on the highlighting of paradoxical situations that caused various disruptions. Essentially, these paradoxes arise from differences between the values upheld by the entrepreneur and changes imposed by the company's requirements for economic survival.
dc.subject.ddclabelDirection d'entrepriseen
dc.relation.conftitle7th International Social Innovation Research Conference (ISIRC 2015)
dc.relation.confcityYork
dc.relation.confcountryUNITED KINGDOM
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.date.updated2018-04-12T14:43:32Z
hal.identifierhal-01278800*
hal.version1*
hal.update.actionupdateMetadata*
hal.update.actionupdateFiles*
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record