Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaint-Lary, Olivier
dc.contributor.authorSicsic, Jonathan
HAL ID: 737289
ORCID: 0000-0002-5509-4791
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-11T14:38:31Z
dc.date.available2015-03-11T14:38:31Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/14769
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectConsultation lengthen
dc.subjectGeneral practitionersen
dc.subjectQuality of careen
dc.subjectPay for performanceen
dc.subject.ddc334en
dc.subject.classificationjelI12en
dc.subject.classificationjelI11en
dc.titleImpact of a pay for performance programme on French GPs’ consultation lengthen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenBackground In 2009, a voluntary-based pay for performance scheme targeting general practitioners (GPs) was introduced in France through the ‘Contract for Improving Individual Practices’ (CAPI). Objective To study the impact of the CAPI on French GPs’ consultation length. Methods Univariate analysis, and multilevel regression analyses were performed to disentangle the different sources of the consultation length variability (intra and inter physician). The dependant variable was the logarithm of the consultation length. Independent variables included patient's sociodemographics as well as the characteristics of GPs and their medical activity. Results Between November 2011 and April 2012, 128 physicians were recruited throughout France and generated 20,779 consultations timed by residents. The average consultation length in the sample was 16.8 min. After adjusting for patients’ characteristics only, the consultation length of CAPI signatories was 14.1% lower than that observed for non signatories (p < 0.001). After adjusting for GPs’ characteristics and the case mix, the CAPI was no longer a significant predictor of the consultation length. The results did not change significantly from one type of consultation to another. Conclusion Although the CAPI was extended to all GPs in 2012, our results provide a cautionary message to regulators about its ability to generate higher quality of care.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameHealth Policy
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol119
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue4
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2015
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages417-426
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2014.10.001en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevieren
dc.subject.ddclabelEconomie socialeen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record