Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSicsic, Jonathan
HAL ID: 737289
ORCID: 0000-0002-5509-4791
dc.contributor.authorLe Vaillant, Marc
dc.contributor.authorFranc, Carine
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-11T14:32:17Z
dc.date.available2015-03-11T14:32:17Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/14768
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectMultilevel analysisen
dc.subjectMultiple correspondence analysisen
dc.subjectPayment for performanceen
dc.subjectExtrinsic motivationen
dc.subjectIntrinsic motivationen
dc.subjectGeneral practitionersen
dc.subject.ddc334en
dc.subject.classificationjelI18en
dc.titleIntrinsic and extrinsic motivations in primary care: An explanatory study among French general practitionersen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenBackground Like many other OECD nations, France has implemented a pay-for-performance (P4P) model in primary care. However, the benefits have been debated, particularly regarding the possibly undesirable effects of extrinsic motivation (EM) on intrinsic motivation (IM). Objective To examine the relationship between French GPs’ IM and EM based on an intrinsic motivation composite score (IMCS) developed for this purpose. If a negative relationship is found, P4P schemes could have side effects on GPs’ IM that is a key determinant of quality of care. Method From data on 423 GPs practicing in a region of France, IM indicators are selected using a multiple correspondence analysis and aggregated from a multilevel model. Results Several doctors’ characteristics have significant impacts on IMCS variability, especially group practice and salaried practice. Qualitative EM variables are negatively correlated with the IMCS: GPs who report not being satisfied with their income or feeling “often” constrained by patients’ requests in terms of consultations length and office appointments obtain a lower mean IMCS than other GPs. Conclusion Our results provide a cautionary message to regulators who should take into account the potential side effects of increasing EM through policies such as P4P.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameHealth Policy
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol108en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue2-3en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2012
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages140-148en
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.08.020en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevieren
dc.subject.ddclabelEconomie socialeen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record