Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMonod, Emmanuel
dc.date.accessioned2009-07-31T08:59:17Z
dc.date.available2009-07-31T08:59:17Z
dc.date.issued2004-04
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/1440
dc.description.abstractfrThe concepts of objectivity and causality, as they are used in general in IS research, and in particular in critical realism, are no longer valid in Physics. Therefore, IS research should consider the “copernician revolution” that happened in Physics and in other sciences. Bhor, Heisenberg and Einstein themselves refer to Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. The two fundamental concepts are therefore no more objectivity and causality, but the “methodological distinction” and the “conditions of possibilities”. This kantian framework, commonly used by other human and social sciences, like sociology or history, indicates a way for an epistemological pluralism in IS research.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectÉpistémologieen
dc.subjectMéthodologieen
dc.subjectSciences socialesen
dc.subject.ddc300en
dc.subject.classificationjelZ19en
dc.titleEinstein, Heinsenberg, Kant : methodological distinction and conditions of possibilitiesen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameInformation and Organization
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol14en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue2en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2004-04
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages105-121en
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2003.12.001en
dc.description.sponsorshipprivateouien
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherPergamonen
dc.subject.ddclabelSciences sociales : généralités, méthodologieen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record