Decision-aid and decision-making
Indexation documentaireRecherche opérationnelle
SubjectDecision analysis; multiple criteria decision making; multi-attribute utility theory; outranking methods; decision-making; decision-aid
Nom de la revueEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Date de publication1990
Nom de l'éditeurElsevier
MétadonnéesAfficher la notice complète
Résumé en anglaisThe objective of multiple criteria approaches is to help us to make better decisions, but what is the meaning of ‘better’? This field has developed considerably in the past twenty years. The development makes us fully aware of the limitations on objectivity encountered in the field of decision-aid and, consequently, of the virtual impossibility of providing a truly scientific foundation for an optimal decision. Work carried out under the rubric of mcdm (multiple criteria decision making) bases its claims to legitimacy on a framework in which these limitations are left aside. multiple criteria decision aid (mcda) must be seen from a different perspective. Its aim is, above all, to enable us to enhance the degree of conformity and coherence between the evolution of a decision-making process and the value systems and objectives of those involved in this process. The purpose of decision-aid is, therefore, to help us make our way in the presence of ambiguity, uncertainty and an abundance of bifurcations. We shall analyse multiple criteria concepts, models and procedures from both these viewpoints.
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
Bouyssou, Denis; Dubois, Didier; Pirlot, Marc; Prade, Henri (2009) Ouvrage
Discriminating thresholds as a tool to cope with imperfect knowledge in multiple criteria decision aiding: Theoretical results and practical issues Roy, Bernard; Figueira, José; Almeida Dias, Juscelino (2014) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Comprendre et prévenir l’erreur récurrente dans les processus de décision stratégique : l’apport de la Behavioral Strategy Sibony, Olivier (2017-12-14) Thèse