Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGolsorkhi, Damon
dc.contributor.authorLeca, Bernard
dc.contributor.authorLounsbury, Michael
dc.contributor.authorRamirez, Carlos
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-14T10:36:06Z
dc.date.available2014-10-14T10:36:06Z
dc.date.issued2009-11
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/14031
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBourdieu, Pierre (1930-2002)en
dc.subjectDominationen
dc.subjectMethodologyen
dc.subjectOrganization studiesen
dc.subjectParticipant objectivationen
dc.subjectReflexivityen
dc.subjectRelational perspectiveen
dc.subjectSocial roles of scholarsen
dc.subject.ddc658en
dc.subject.classificationjelA13en
dc.subject.classificationjelA14en
dc.subject.classificationjelM1en
dc.titleAnalysing, Accounting for and Unmasking Domination: On Our Role as Scholars of Practice, Practitioners of Social Science and Public Intellectualsen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenOver the last 30 years, there has been an increasing interest in organizational analysis for the work of Pierre Bourdieu. However, the consequent body of literature often lacks an integrated comprehension of Bourdieusian theory and therefore fails to fully exploit its potentialities. In this essay, we argue for a more systematic engagement with the work of Bourdieu by organizational scholars and emphasize the opportunity to develop cumulative research on domination within and between organizations. The means by which systems of domination are reproduced without conscious intention by agents is a central issue for Bourdieu and arguably the primary reason for the development of his theoretical framework. It is thus through the study of domination that one can acquire a panoramic vision of Bourdieusian concepts that have been otherwisetoo often tackled separately. Moreover, domination is also a key entry to the understanding of how social scientists produce their own knowledge and of their role as members of society. We emphasize that as scholars, we have a moral responsibility to be reflexive about our practice and the social worlds we study in order to ultimately use the knowledge we produce to inform and direct social progress.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameOrganization
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol16en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue6en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2009-11
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages779-797en
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1350508409343400en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherSageen
dc.subject.ddclabelGestion des entreprisesen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record