Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoy, Bernard
dc.date.accessioned2014-08-26T13:50:26Z
dc.date.available2014-08-26T13:50:26Z
dc.date.issued1987
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/13830
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectDecision theoryen
dc.subjectcommunicationen
dc.subjectbehaviouren
dc.subjectgamesen
dc.subjectinformation theoryen
dc.subject.ddc003en
dc.titleMeaning and validity of interactive procedures as tools for decision makingen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenThis papers examines procedures based on answers to questions an entity Q asks an actor D in accordance with a protocol P. The aim is either to select an alternative a∗, considered by D to be the optimal choice among a set of alternatives A, or to formulate a utility function U, considered relevant by D for comparing alternatives in A. What gives meaning to the final result of this type of interactive procedure? On which criteria can its validity be assessed? In analysing three questions of a parlor game, we can produce evidence that the answers to such questions do not depend on P alone, but that the way in which D produces his answers plays just a central role. Threee different hypotheses concerning this points led us to a new approach to this type of question, an approach which point out the illusive nature of certain types of answers.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameEuropean Journal of Operational Research
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol31en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue3en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate1987
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages297-303en
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90039-7en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevieren
dc.subject.ddclabelRecherche opérationnelleen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record