Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSalin, Pascal
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-19T09:18:31Z
dc.date.available2014-06-19T09:18:31Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/13547
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectEconomics and financeen
dc.subjectaustrian economicsen
dc.subjecthistory of economic thoughten
dc.subjectpublic choice theoryen
dc.subjectpublic financeen
dc.subjectpublic sector economicsen
dc.subjectpolitics and public policyen
dc.subjectpublic choiceen
dc.subject.ddc330.1en
dc.subject.classificationjelB25en
dc.subject.classificationjelB53en
dc.titleThe neglected importance of Austrian thought in public economicsen
dc.typeChapitre d'ouvrage
dc.description.abstractenIt is traditionally claimed that the State has three main categories of policies to implement: allocation, distribution and stabilization policies. In the present chapter we will be concerned only with stabilization policies or, more generally, with the role public policies may have in determining macroeconomic processes. In fact, the recent financial crisis ought to be considered as an opportunity to assess the relevance of different economic theories concerning economic policies. This is not a purely intellectual concern, but it ought to be considered as a practical problem of the utmost importance. In fact, any human action is the outcome of a process of thought which means that there is no action without theory. Therefore, the necessity of theorizing is not debatable, but the important problem is to select the most relevant theory. From this point of view it is striking that most commentators did not refer to the most relevant theory to explain the recent crisis or to decide the most efficient solutions. Two main errors have been made about the recent crisis (and, probably, about any other crisis). First the most widely accepted interpretation of the crisis consists in stressing that it was a consequence of the fundamentally unstable nature of the market mechanisms and, moreover, of the immoral behavior of bankers who were mostly concerned with the maximization of their profits so that they took too many risks.en
dc.identifier.citationpages21-33en
dc.relation.ispartoftitleA Handbook of Alternative Theories of Public Economicsen
dc.relation.ispartofeditorForte, Francesco
dc.relation.ispartofeditorMudambi, Ram
dc.relation.ispartofeditorNavarra, Pietro Maria
dc.relation.ispartofpublnameEdward Elgaren
dc.relation.ispartofpublcityCheltenhamen
dc.relation.ispartofdate2014
dc.relation.ispartofpages576en
dc.relation.ispartofurlhttp://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781004715en
dc.subject.ddclabelThéorie économiqueen
dc.relation.ispartofisbn9781781004708en
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781781004715.00007en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record