| dc.contributor.author | Guichard, Renelle | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2009-07-24T07:59:51Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2009-07-24T07:59:51Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/1342 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.subject | Military R&D | en |
| dc.subject | Public Policy | en |
| dc.subject | National system of innovation | en |
| dc.subject | Dual use | en |
| dc.subject.ddc | 338.9 | en |
| dc.subject.classificationjel | O31 | en |
| dc.subject.classificationjel | O32 | en |
| dc.title | Suggested repositioning of defence R&D within the French system of innovation | en |
| dc.type | Article accepté pour publication ou publié | |
| dc.description.abstracten | Are governments right to support technological progress through military R&D? If so, which
are the most appropriate institutions and organizational patterns for a fruitful relationship
between military R&D and the economy in general?
A comparative analysis of the US and the French systems of innovation leads us to the idea
that the answer lies in integrating civilian and military innovation structures around the key
concept of dual-use. Building on a model developed by Metcalfe and Saviotti (1984), the
purpose of this article is to introduce organizational patterns and tools (so-called “pillars”) on
which to build a dual-use policy. We then apply this model to the French case and we
formulate recommendations regarding the repositioning of its defence R&D. | en |
| dc.relation.isversionofjnlname | Technovation | |
| dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol | 25 | en |
| dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue | 3 | en |
| dc.relation.isversionofjnldate | 2005-03 | |
| dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages | 195-201 | en |
| dc.relation.isversionofdoi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00131-7 | en |
| dc.description.sponsorshipprivate | oui | en |
| dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisher | Elsevier | en |
| dc.subject.ddclabel | Croissance et développement économiques | en |
