Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPisani-Ferry, Jean
dc.contributor.authorSapir, André
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-09T09:23:41Z
dc.date.available2014-01-09T09:23:41Z
dc.date.issued2009-10
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/12380
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBank failuresen
dc.subjectBank managementen
dc.subjectFinancial crisesen
dc.subjectBanking industryen
dc.subjectFinancial institutionsen
dc.subjectManagementen
dc.subjectAD hoc organizationsen
dc.subjectEconomic aspectsen
dc.subject2007-2009 banking crisisen
dc.subject.ddc332en
dc.subject.classificationjelG24en
dc.subject.classificationjelG21en
dc.titleBanking Crisis Management in the EU: An Interim Assessmenten
dc.typeCommunication / Conférence
dc.contributor.editoruniversityotherUniversité Libre de Bruxelles;Belgique
dc.description.abstractenFor well over a decade many observers had warned that the European Union was ill-prepared in case of a financial storm because its market integration far outpaced its policy integration. This situation was well known to policy-makers but it was hoped that financial crises would wait until policy integration occurred. The reality turned out differently, however. We assess the management of the 2007--2009 banking crisis within the EU against this backdrop. In a nutshell, we find that Europe has done better than could have been expected on the basis of existing arrangements. The two federal institutions acted swiftly, the European Central Bank by providing ample liquidity and the European Commission by enforcing competition discipline flexibly. However, there was no institutional innovation in the form of an EU-financed bail-out of transnational financial institutions or a genuine EU financial stress test. Supervisory responsibilities remained entirely with individual countries and coordination problems were managed through a combination of ad-hoc, discretionary cooperation and reliance on EU rules and procedures. It is not possible, however, to determine whether this relatively satisfactory situation is due to the fact that ad-hoc coordination was fundamentally sufficient or because no complex case of cross-border bank failure occurred.en
dc.identifier.citationpages31en
dc.subject.ddclabelEconomie financièreen
dc.relation.conftitleEconomic Policy Fiftieth Panel Meetingen
dc.relation.confdate2009-10
dc.relation.confcityTilburgen
dc.relation.confcountryPays-Basen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record