Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoyer, Anne-Charlotte
dc.contributor.authorPonton-Sanchez, Alice
dc.contributor.authorJoël, Marie-Eve
dc.contributor.authorColvez, Alain
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-17T09:33:41Z
dc.date.available2013-12-17T09:33:41Z
dc.date.issued2002-06
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/12302
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAlzheimeren
dc.subjectCaregiveren
dc.subjectHealth statusen
dc.subjectServicesen
dc.subjectWork burdenen
dc.subject.ddc334en
dc.subject.classificationjelI12en
dc.titleHealth status and work burden of Alzheimer patients’ informal caregivers: Comparisons of five different care programs in the European Unionen
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenBackground: In 1998, a research study was conducted to compare existing programs in the European Union providing both care to people with senile dementia of the Alzheimer type, and support to their informal caregiver. Method: Five programs were selected in seven centres. Home social services (Denmark), Day centres (Germany), Expert Centres (Belgium, Spain), Group Living/Cantou (Sweden, France), Respite hospitalization (France). In each centre, 50 patients were randomly selected. The questionnaire addressed informal caregivers (or referents). It included the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), the Zarit Scale, and it collected data on age, sex and position (spouse or child) of the informal caregiver, as well as age, level of mental deterioration and disabilities of the patient. Results: (n=322 subjects) Comparatively with caregivers of Respite hospitalization patients chosen as the reference, caregivers of patients cared by Group living/Cantou and Home social services experienced a significantly lower burden. The benefit from the Expert centre program concerned emotional reactions (depression) (odds ratio=0.32; P=0.02) and work burden (Zarit) (OR=0.32; P=0.04). The main benefit for caregivers who received Day centre help was the important reduction of feelings of social isolation (OR=0.13; P=0.0003). Conclusions: The Group Living/Cantou program appeared as the most efficient way to reduce informal caregiver burden, independently from the country considered.en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameHealth Policy
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol60en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue3en
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2002-06
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages219-233en
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp/dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(01)00215-9en
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherElsevieren
dc.subject.ddclabelEconomie socialeen
dc.relation.forthcomingnonen
dc.relation.forthcomingprintnonen


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record