• français
    • English
  • English 
    • français
    • English
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
BIRD Home

Browse

This CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals BIRDResearch centres & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Landslides in Mountainous Regions of Northern Vietnam: Causes, Protection Strategies and the Assessment of Economic Losses

Thumbnail
View/Open
298.pdf (378.3Kb)
Date
2009
Dewey
Economie de la terre et des ressources naturelles
Sujet
Landslide Protection; Economic Valuation; Vietnam
JEL code
D6; H4; L3; Q25; Q51
Journal issue
International Journal of Ecological Economics and Statistics
Volume
15
Number
F09
Publication date
2009
Article pages
108-130
Publisher
CESER Publications
URI
https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/11413
Collections
  • LEDa : Publications
Metadata
Show full item record
Author
Ahlheim, Michael
Fror, Oliver
Heinke, Antonia
Keil, Alwin
Duc, Nguyen Minh
Dinh, Pham Van
Saint-Macary, Camille
Zeller, Manfred
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publié
Abstract (EN)
Landslides are a severe problem during the rainy season in many mountainous regions in Asia where forests have been cut down so that mountain slopes are destabilized. In this study we analyze the extent and causes of landslides in a mountainous area in Northern Vietnam as viewed from the perspective of the population concerned. We also scrutinize the ideas of these people regarding suitable landslide protection measures and their willingness to contribute to the practical implementation of these measures. It is shown that the majority of people living in this area feels highly concerned about the frequent landslide events and that they support the idea of government programs to mitigate the danger of future landslides. We measure the utility they expect from such a landslide protection program, i. e. the social value of such a program, in terms of their willingness to contribute personally to its implementation. Since household budgets are tight in these rural areas where subsistence farming still prevails we also analyze the possibilities to measure these expected utility gains in terms of people's willingness to support the proposed landslide protection program through working time instead of money. The prospect of employing such an alternative means of contribution is, however, seen rather critical.

  • Accueil Bibliothèque
  • Site de l'Université Paris-Dauphine
  • Contact
SCD Paris Dauphine - Place du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris Cedex 16

 Content on this site is licensed under a Creative Commons 2.0 France (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0) license.