The Genesis of 'Positive Economics' and the Rejection of Monopolistic Competition Theory: A Methodological Debate
Keppler, Jan-Horst (1998), The Genesis of 'Positive Economics' and the Rejection of Monopolistic Competition Theory: A Methodological Debate, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, 3, p. 261-276
Type
Article accepté pour publication ou publiéDate
1998-05Journal name
Cambridge Journal of EconomicsVolume
22Number
3Publisher
Oxford University Press
Pages
261-276
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract (EN)
In 'The Methodology of Positive Economics' (1953), Milton Friedman linked the adoption of a falsificationist methodology to the rejection of monopolistic competition as a valid assumption, thus elaborating a point made earlier by George Stigler in 'Monopolistic Competition in Retrospect' (1949). Both failed to demonstrate that the alternative assumption of perfect competition would perform better under falsificationist rules. These rules themselves are an expression of the ambition to establish an economic science rather than a convincing framework for research. Monopolistic competition theory became the main target of attack, as it highlighted the problematic nature of empirical research interested in perfectly generalizable results.Subjects / Keywords
Competition; Methodological; Methodology; Monopolistic Competition; Positive EconomicsRelated items
Showing items related by title and author.
-
Keppler, Jan-Horst (2001) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Keppler, Jan-Horst (2007-09) Communication / Conférence
-
Keppler, Jan-Horst (2007) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Keppler, Jan-Horst; Lallement, Jérôme (2006) Article accepté pour publication ou publié
-
Keppler, Jan-Horst (2012) Article accepté pour publication ou publié