Participative design of participation structures: a general approach and some risk management case studies

Debray, Bruno; Tsoukiàs, Alexis; Merad, Myriam; Mazri, Chabane

hal.structure.identifier	Institut National de l´Environnement Industriel et des Risques
dc.contributor.author	Debray, Bruno	*
hal.structure.identifier
dc.contributor.author	Tsoukiàs, Alexis HAL ID: 740501 ORCID: 0000-0001-5772-3988	*
hal.structure.identifier	Institut National de l´Environnement Industriel et des Risques
dc.contributor.author	Merad, Myriam HAL ID: 742742	*
hal.structure.identifier	Institut National de l´Environnement Industriel et des Risques
dc.contributor.author	Mazri, Chabane	*
dc.date.accessioned	2012-11-21T10:36:36Z
dc.date.available	2012-11-21T10:36:36Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.identifier.uri	https://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/10610
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.subject	Decision aid
dc.subject	participative structures
dc.subject	Industrial risk management
dc.subject.ddc	003	en
dc.subject.classificationjel	D81	en
dc.title	Participative design of participation structures: a general approach and some risk management case studies
dc.type	Document de travail / Working paper
dc.description.abstracten	Organising participation of multiple stakeholders is nowadays a widespread request in decisionprocesses, especially for organisations managing environmental risks. Therefore, analystsdelivering decision support are expected to provide decision makers with scientifically sound andpractically realisable approaches regarding this issue. One of the main challenges in dealing withparticipation is the definition of the organisation, the so called participative structure, throughwhich stakeholders will contribute and interact during the decision process. Who shouldparticipate when and according to which rules are the main questions to be answered. Stakesassociated to this challenge are of extreme importance for decision makers since decisionlegitimacy and acceptance strongly relies on the ability to demonstrate a real transparency andinformation disclosure during the whole decision process.This paper proposes the iterative comparison approach as a new and original frame to be used byan analyst supporting a client dealing with such questions. Through an unambiguous definition ofcognitive artefacts to be constructed when designing participative structures, this paper providesa clear framework that organises an analyst intervention in participative contexts. Furthermore,it offers the opportunity to design tailored participative structures that integrate contextspecificities in one hand, and satisfies quality criteria being fairness, competence and efficiencyon the other hand.
dc.publisher.city	Paris	en
dc.identifier.citationpages	33
dc.relation.ispartofseriestitle	Cahier du LAMSADE
dc.subject.ddclabel	Recherche opérationnelle	en
dc.description.submitted	non	en
dc.description.ssrncandidate	non
dc.description.halcandidate	oui
dc.description.readership	recherche
dc.description.audience	International
dc.date.updated	2019-07-18T07:35:47Z
hal.identifier	hal-01511011	*
hal.version	1	*
hal.update.action	updateMetadata	*
hal.update.action	updateFiles	*
hal.author.function	aut
hal.author.function	aut
hal.author.function	aut
hal.author.function	aut

Files in this item

Name:: cahier_327.pdf
Size:: 1.891Mb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

LAMSADE : Publications

Show simple item record

Participative design of participation structures: a general approach and some risk management case studies

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Related items