Show simple item record

Towards an analytics and an ethics of expertise: Learning from decision aiding experiences in public risk assessment and risk management

hal.structure.identifierInstitut National de l´Environnement Industriel et des Risques
dc.contributor.authorDechy, Nicolas*
hal.structure.identifier
dc.contributor.authorLlory, Michel*
hal.structure.identifierSenior Scientist
dc.contributor.authorMarcel, Frédéric*
hal.structure.identifierInstitut National de l´Environnement Industriel et des Risques
dc.contributor.authorMerad, Myriam
HAL ID: 742742		*
hal.structure.identifier
dc.contributor.authorTsoukiàs, Alexis
HAL ID: 740501
ORCID: 0000-0001-5772-3988		*
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-21T10:34:46Z
dc.date.available2012-11-21T10:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn2193-9438
dc.identifier.urihttps://basepub.dauphine.fr/handle/123456789/10609
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectExpertise
dc.subjectrisks
dc.subjectethics
dc.subjectsecurity and environment
dc.subjectsafety
dc.subjectanalytics
dc.subject.ddc003en
dc.subject.classificationjelD81en
dc.titleTowards an analytics and an ethics of expertise: Learning from decision aiding experiences in public risk assessment and risk management
dc.typeArticle accepté pour publication ou publié
dc.description.abstractenPublic expertise in safety, security and environment (SSE) is a process that is increasingly submitted to control and transparency. As decision-making, the exercise of expertise involves subjectivity and judgment. An oversight, a monitoring and an aiding approach is therefore required for its conduct and its governance. This paper proposes a novel way of embedding ethical aspects and participative decision-making elements into the process of risk assessment and risks management. Based on their experience feedback, the authors first propose some early contributions to study the validity and the legitimacy of expertise in SSE. In the second part of the paper, the authors give an overview on how public expertise is organized in France and how the problems and the conclusions are framed in SSE. Finally, the authors propose a generic integrated framework for public expertise that constitutes the “responsible exercise of expertise”. This framework allows framing a valid and a legitimate expertise process and its conclusions.
dc.relation.isversionofjnlnameEURO Journal on Decision Processes
dc.relation.isversionofjnlvol2
dc.relation.isversionofjnlissue1-2
dc.relation.isversionofjnldate2014
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpages63-90
dc.relation.isversionofdoihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40070-013-0022-5
dc.relation.isversionofjnlpublisherSpringer
dc.subject.ddclabelRecherche opérationnelleen
dc.description.submittednonen
dc.description.ssrncandidatenon
dc.description.halcandidateoui
dc.description.readershiprecherche
dc.description.audienceInternational
dc.relation.Isversionofjnlpeerreviewedoui
dc.date.updated2019-07-18T07:36:16Z
hal.faultCode{"duplicate-entry":{"ineris-00963518":{"doi":"1.0"}}}
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut
hal.author.functionaut


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
cahier_326.pdf
Size:
2.313Mb
Format:
PDF
View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record